so i answered the questions. and here are my results. i guess my 3rd choice should be McCain who only had only 2% on Huckabee. and it's sad to think that if i were going for the television vote i'd have to pick the law & order guy before colbert...
So here's the question: if - all things considered - my ideals lie pretty close to those of both dem choices, what is so wrong with gender playing a little part of my vote? that's not to say it will - i'm not giving it up that easy - it's just a question. seriously though - why shouldn't that be a valid - if not nearly as important as the rest of the issues - part of the process? just asking.
Your Results:
Sunday, February 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
1. Theoretical Ideal Candidate (100%)
2. Alan Keyes (74%)
3. Kent McManigal(73%)
4. Ron Paul (72%)
5. Duncan Hunter(68%)
6. Tom Tancredo (68%)
7. Chuck Hagel(58%) I
8. Stephen Colber(58%)
9. Sam Brownback (57%)
10. Mike Gravel (56%)
11. Jim Gilmore(52%) I
12. Newt Gingrich(50%)
13. Mitt Romney (48%)
14. John McCain (48%)
15. Wayne Allyn R 16. Hillary Clinton (45%
17. C)hristopher Dodd (44%)
18. Barack Obama (44%)
19. Fred Thompson (withdrawn) (42%) Information link
20. Tommy Thompson (withdrawn, endorsed Giuliani) (41%) Information link
21. Dennis Kucinich (withdrawn) (40%) Information link
22. Mike Huckabee (39%) Information link
23. Joseph Biden (withdrawn) (39%) Information link
24. Michael Bloomberg (says he will not run) (37%) Information link
25. Alan Augustson (campaign suspended) (36%) Information link
26. Bill Richardson (withdrawn) (35%) Information link
27. John Edwards (withdrawn) (32%) Information link
28. Al Gore (not announced) (28%)
29. Rudolph Giuliani (withdrawn, endorsed McCain) (28%) Information link
30. Wesley Clark (not running, endorsed Clinton) (27%) Information link
31. Elaine Brown (12%) Information link
by the same logic, would it be ok to vote AGAINST Hillary because she's a woman?
by the same logic, would it be ok to vote AGAINST Hillary because she's a woman?
no. your logic would be the same if i said i would vote for hillary because i wanted to vote AGAINST the black guy. voting against hillary because she's a girl is sexist. voting against barack because he's black is racist. in my question, i like both. in yours, you don't. if you said you wanted to vote for barack because he's a guy - i wouldn't have an issue. but excluding her just because she's a girl... not so much.
Post a Comment